When is it effective?
Human resource management - what it is, principles and functions of the process
There are a number of reasons why it is necessary to adopt an authoritarian leadership style. Among them, there are periods in an enterprise when the discipline of employees decreases, and along with it, the financial indicators of the organization itself and its income decrease. An autocratic director is required in order to improve the work of the team, albeit by taking tough measures. In extreme cases, the weakest links will leave their positions, and other employees will be hired to fill them. With characteristic management, an organization in decline will soon regain its previous position and strive for progress.
Note! Employees who have experienced a change in leadership style should remember that this is a temporary phenomenon. With maximum patience, obedience and skills, each team member will be able to become part of that historical moment when the organization emerges from the crisis.
Basic mistakes
Types of communication in psychology - what they include, its functions
The authoritarian leadership style is a tool that is advisable to use for a limited time, otherwise the authoritarian leader may cross the line by feeling the power and beginning to abuse it. Given that the authoritarian style does not allow for the usual friendly conversations with subordinates, many managers often forget themselves, and instead of giving the usual order, they resort to sharp criticism, including insults and humiliation. In this leadership style, rewards are also not welcome, but punishments for disobedience or incorrect execution of orders may take on an inadequate form.
An authoritarian leader bears great responsibility
An authoritarian leader is a person with a huge amount of responsibility. It is unacceptable to neglect this responsibility, as well as to attempt to assign it to subordinates. However, in the pursuit of productivity, some managers may lose self-control, taking out their anger for existing failures, missed deadlines, etc. on employees. The only thing this will lead to is the loss of employees one after another, which clearly will not benefit the organization. It is one thing to punish or fire an employee for insubordination. Another is to intimidate him so that other team members decide to leave their jobs, deprived of motivation and faith in the positive results of hard work.
